E-Hologram Theory-Chain of uncertainties for the Universe: The list begins below
In response to the overwhelming interest, well at least the
whelming interest, in the e-hologram universe model, I will take a moment to
point out the chain (of uncertainties, whether intentionally omitted for a
later time or because it’s just unclear) of connectivity between g-space and
o-space. I will start at the singularity
(g-space-which isn’t space at all as we see it) and move outward towards
o-space (which may or may not be actual space so we’ll have to include that
one, har har).
In making these I am willing to depart conceptually from Einstein's hypothesis which does not require it be something different from e-hologram theory any more than Einstein's findings require a complete rejection of Newtonian physics
This is not a religious theory although it does allow for a
Genesis type of god by virtue of logic, rather than by mere faith. Instead it is designed as an intuitive
theory based upon observed phenomena outside of Newtonian (i.e. day to day)
physics and will at least try to make a passing bow to relativity and the
various mathematical models which all try to cram Newtonian physics into a non-Newtonian
environment. This one may also as
written, but it’s unintentional.
As is clear from the list, any of these theories falls apart
of necessity as we delve deeper into it.
The reason is that once we get to g-space even if we completely
understand it we have to ask what’s behind g-space. Existence is not explainable. We should not by rights exist since a close
examination of existence means that we must go further and further back till we
eventually get to a place where some origin must make sense or we do not really
exist which means I’m wasting time writing and you’re wasting time reading.
While I plan to head back that way and will mention it
briefly, I do not plan on getting there.
We’ll just accept for the sake of argument that we do exist and since
there is NO underpinning for existence we must, ipso facto, accept that no
matter how little logic there is to a premise based on our perception, if it is
intuitive it is as likely as the next thing.
This list is not intended to be inclusive but it will allow
us to address these items one at a time in later blogs.
Anyway here we go:
1)
What is g-space made of:
a.
One singularity
i.
One universe
1.
One time
2.
Multiple times with different outcomes (helix)
3.
Multiple times with same outcome (loop)
4.
Everything happening at once pending the
application of time
5.
Potential for anything to happen once time
applied
b.
Multiple singularities separated by what, no
space, so who knows
i.
More than one universe with 1-3 list for each
c.
Time-if you can add it , it must there
d.
Intelligence
i.
Creation of time/linearity
ii.
Possible without time
2)
Who or what made/makes g-space
a.
Is g-space a fundamental
b.
Is g-space just one more layer of non-dimensional
timeless onion
i.
Super g-space
ii.
Other versions of g-space
iii.
If we are g-space (as defined below) what is
g-space
3)
Potential/possibility vs tendency
a.
Tendency: Einstein-everything happens at once
i.
No self determination in reality
1.
Good
2.
Evil
b.
Potential: The potential for something to happen
i.
Potential to change events
1.
Potential good
2.
Potential evil
4)
All thought vs a thought broken out
a.
Is every intelligence in g-space by virtue of
every event
b.
Is there a single intelligence that is broken up
by the addition of time
5)
Time as consciousness of g-space
a.
Critical mass consciousness
i.
Did time begin when enough “events/intelligence”
come to be
1.
Was it always at critical mass (time)
2.
How did it reach critical mass (how built)
b.
Constant consciousness
c.
What is this form of awareness that creates time
i.
Same as ours
ii.
Different than ours
iii.
Is ours a subset of it (Einstein)
iv.
Is it separate from ours (God)
v.
Consciousness exists in g-space and is merely
applied to the singularity
6)
How many times/dimensions are there
a.
Assumes time gives apparent dimension
b.
One time with all dimensions built into it
c.
Multiple times
i.
Joined times
ii.
Separate times (proximity doesn’t join)
iii.
Blended times (proximity joins them so they are
joined and not joind)
7)
How long are time dimensions
a.
One length
b.
Multiple length
8)
Gravity as a function of consciousness
a.
Tendency to return to singularity
b.
Tendency to give up time (same thing?)
9)
Actual movement from singularity vs movement
from singularity
a.
Is this even a real consideration
b.
This is a real consideration
10)
Anti-gravity and dark matter
a.
Different times
i.
Different consciousness (what is this form of
awareness)
ii.
Same consciousness
b.
Same Time
i.
Therefore different dimensions
1.
Invisibility of different dimensions (somehow
isolated)
2.
Visibility of different dimensions (ability to
travel to)
11)
Gravity as a visual tool (visual to the
singularity)
a.
Does God or anyone else see it
b.
Is its visualization to the singularity merely a
coincidence tied to its tendency to give up time and return to the singularity
12)
Gravity as the tendency to give up time/tendency
to return to singularity
13)
Multiple forms of matter
a.
Different application of time
i.
Different dimension of time
1.
Separate dimensions
2.
Different lengths of dimension
b.
Different application of gravity
14)
Moral imperatives
a.
Our purpose in e-hologram theory
b.
The purpose of intelligence
c.
The source of good and evil
Dark Matter
The question of dark matter can be at least one of three things:
1) it may be singularity with a different time, but in proximity to the tie we live in;
2) it may be "damaged/different/defective" time with different dimensions;
3) it may be the singularity itself; that is it may be tendency/possibility to which time hasn't attached
4) it may be tendency after time has moved on to the next tendency
All of these are different sides of the same coin.
The exact nature of dark matter, The question of how time attaches to light or matter will have to wait till later.
Dark Matter
The question of dark matter can be at least one of three things:
1) it may be singularity with a different time, but in proximity to the tie we live in;
2) it may be "damaged/different/defective" time with different dimensions;
3) it may be the singularity itself; that is it may be tendency/possibility to which time hasn't attached
4) it may be tendency after time has moved on to the next tendency
All of these are different sides of the same coin.
The exact nature of dark matter, The question of how time attaches to light or matter will have to wait till later.
Well, I have things to do (time) so this will not be as
comprehensive as the name implies, but it’s a start and it’s hard to write
around certain things (and you know what they are!). This strange labor of love you will not
understand unless you are capable of understanding love which is a chain of
uncertainties of an entirely different sort.
In the second version of H.G. Well’s movie-fied “Time Machine” heartbreak is necessary to provide the drive,
the force behind invention. Nothing is
more true. In “China’s Weaponized
Economy” the need for stress to improve performance is discussed in more
depth. The deeper the depth of sadness,
the closer our consciousness goes to the void.
For some, it means death and a joining to the singularity. For others it means getting so close that the
effects of the concentration of intelligence without time drives them mad. For others it is inspiration or genius. It is for you to determine where I am driven
for few feel more deeply than me without madness. Ah poetry, you never know if the poet is
crying or laughing at you, sigh.
No comments:
Post a Comment