equivalent theories of the expanding universe one of two

There are many issues I want to address.
There is a significant post W wants to put up relative to the War with China, a discussion of the food network's program on octopus preparation in Greece which might never be published, and several pending blogs relative to certain non-historical events, but those get tabled this afternoon in favor of a short discussion of various models of universal expansion.
Dark energy (invisible energy) is given credit for expansion of the universe and the equivalent for dark energy (like dark matter) in e-hologram theory would be time and its influence on the singularity or perhaps energy inherent in tendancy in the singularity without time, therefore without dimension and therefor invisible.
Since both dark matter and energy would require time to have an effect, it can potentially be seen, as previously alluded to, as being effected by the dispersion effect of time.  That is, if time is attached to all energy and matter to give the appearance of dimension and separation from the singularity and if time for proximate items tends to blend together than some residual effect for tendencies which do not have time in the singularity might be "energized" or "matterized" for purposes of having gravity and effect in the apparent o-space.
Note that the merits and de-merits of time as quantized to matter and the associated concept of time as being dispersible have not been discussed in detail yet and are refuted in part by relativity somewhat given the fact that a speeding missle through space would have a different time than the surrounding space apparently.
  Since time gives dimension in the theory, expansion resulting from the process of adding dimension to the universe is almost implicit since dimension implies movement and movement is heat.  However, this blog does not rely only on equivalence.  It instead is just a point of discussion.
Without getting into the Hubble's law too far, we know that the radius of the universe (and the energy contained for that matter) is time dependent and the velocity of expansion is a function of the change in time (all velocities depend on a change in time, of course).
Under non-hologram theory there are three models.  e-hologram theory provides a few discomforting alternatives which will be discussed (finite time deprivation-predicted mathematically & time loop & time change or time degredation and elastic time-we get to a certain point and everything snaps back and perhaps runs in reverse to that point since it is time driven and not gravity driven conceptually).
The basic non-hologram models are (1) A steady state universe which has been expanding and will eventually stop and shrink back, (2) A non-steady state universe which expands and then stops expanding but doesn't shrink back, (3) A universe which continues to expand without acceleration and (4) the observed universe which expands at an ever accelerating rate.
Each of these models and even e-hologram theory to some extent find the universe expanding from a singularity or big bang.  E-hologram theory only argues the singularity exists and, as is oft repeated, black holes almost require it.
There are problems with all steady state string universes.
The steady state universes don't end correctly.
Biblical Creation is close to the universe and those who designed the model had lots of time to think about it.  No prior knowledge polluted their view, but as long as they said "light" and not "time" there are conceptual problems.  Also, they were willing to stop their investigation at "god" without asking where god came from much as many physicists today try to pin down matter (strings, waves, particles) without trying to figure out where matter comes from.  While even this investigation begins to break down when we get to "awareness" creating time as a possibility it readily accepts that unless we are dealing with the day to day requirements of Newtonian physics (which are the most important concerns for day to day problems) it does attempt to define time, matter, dimension and singularity in terms of their basic units.  Unfortunately, even these "basic units" arguments begins to get circular.  They leave open the question of what environment gives rise to the singularity and the question of what time is and what time is not.
We will deal with the equivalent options provided by e-hologram theory (as set out briefly above) in the second installment with a focus on:
Constant expansion vs e-hologram alternatives.
Big Bang without Singularity vs with singularity (e-hologram theory)