The purpose of e-hologram theory and prayer

The purpose of e-hologram theory is only to provide a conceptual basis for a very small part of our understanding although it should be the basis for the universe we experience at the very least if it is a worthwhile exploration.
String and loop theory get fairly close (s-hologram theory is a branch of string theory) but they seek to have "gravity" attached to matter and miss the mark in that the only thing that matters is the attachment of time to "something" and the "something" is a type of string and a type of loop in that it is "tendencies" or "events" that exist all at once in the singularity and are burned linearly (like a string) but don't stop existing in the singularity (like a loop they happen from beginning to end when time is attached (at least some beginning and some end)).
The real meat of the exploration is not exactly e-hologram theory.  This is because to get to time travel and faster than light travel you have to ignore the e-hologram (am I saying too much here given the contest?  I think so and not).  The real exploration is an examination of the singularity and time.
 Everything else is just a  projection. because we can see the projection, we can deduce many things (and they are somewhat deduced in prior blog entries).
Imagine a world, well technically not a world or even a universe but something, where time (and therefore space) don't exist except as reagents.  Where there is at least one but perhaps several singularities containing all the knowledge and all the events of our universe all at once, all the wisdom, all the love, all the heartbreak in one...well we can't call it a spot or place because both of those have some dimension so lets say..point.  where even though there is no time and therefore no dimensions (at least none as we understand them...you cannot move along an axis without time) that there is something called time that can be added to get a reaction that displays our universe, our lives, in their entirety.
If such a place exists (and black holes almost scream in the affirmative) then it is a magical and perhaps god like place.  I'm not arguing in favor of religion here, so don't mistake the meaning.  I think it makes a strong argument for religion in some sense, the sense that the entire knowledge and emotion of everything is concentrated without time in one place (one point), that all that ever was or will be (in time) is concentrated in one place (one point).  That seems to have a lot of the features of the god of Genesis.  It's not exactly the same thing, but maybe its more and maybe its less.
In such a universe the idea of self awareness (which requires time) and the explosion of these events into our universe (the big bang as it were) might be simultaneous and perhaps explainable.  The mere concept of becoming aware of the existence of the singularity (by the singularity) makes the existence of time and therefore the universe inevitable.  The energy is already concentrated into a point so going from there to me typing this blog entry is a fairly short jump.  The unresolved questions are the examination of the singularity and using the existence (assuming of course it exists) of the singularity to improve things in the universe where time has been applied to it.
Prayer-One wonders if the universe was created in this fashion what the effect would be of one asking the universe for something.  Another chance, love, relief from pain, etc.  Is it (the singularity) capable of changing to provide relief or is the mere fact that you can ask for something or do ask for it mean that you know it may happen because it already has (whether it is for true love, the release from the pain of a broken heart or a ticket on the Hogwarts express).
Do we have the ability to shape the universe given the fact that it is already shaped?  Given the fact that it isn't already shaped (that is potential in the singularity is not fixed and therefore Einstein was wrong, that there is a reason for time besides the fact that otherwise everything happens at once).  It is a circular argument to some extent, but the answer is also yes..and no.
More on this later.