Before getting into this let me say that I went to an eye doctor appointment today. These appointments tell me that one day I will see worse than I see now. I can't see anyway after all that my eyes are subjected to. I was smart and went swimming beforehand. The 3000 yards didn't kill me, so I went to my eye doctor appointment.
Even as I begin to see things more clearly in the quantum mechanical world, in the day to day world, things fade. Ironic? That's the point, and its the last post. Let's get to this post.
We'll start with another flower:
This one also looked like a flower, particularly when I first drew it by hand and it's basically the same concept as the prior drawing but this one doesn't tend towards a curved universe and hence seems to have less validity. In both cases there is a common location of quantum change about 2^0; but in this model there would be a great deal more overlap of spiral arms leading up to the common point designated as the location of quantum change. However, these overlaps are not mathematically relevant to the solution at the location of quantum change and are not contraindicated. Indeed, the evolution of change is defined by the movement of each spiral towards the location of quantum change. It is to be noted in this embodiment, that the spirals are shown as offset based on each one being the next larger spiral, but this is an arbitrary designation except that some higher states will outlive some shorter states because the compression equation requires this. However, it is also observed that many higher spirals end before the lower spirals end. If the lower states are included, then this model would not necessarily be included.
The top drawing does have something extra, it shows a spiral intersecting from an opposite location which, presumably would cancel out the opposite spiral of the higher state, but could, in the absence of ct4 (matter) at an intersecting location result in the change of direction, so that the spiral was absorbed onto the line represented by the direction of gravity.
The value of these models is that they allow the interaction at the point of quantum existence to be determined used relatively simple geometric calculations. How these are determined is somewhat complicated because while theta is information, it becomes difficult to use because of quantum concerns. For example using the sin function to determine the relative value of information for the ct2 state alone you end up looking at this:
ct2=ct1^2
So the cos(ct1)*pi+cos(ct1^2*pi/2) would yield an equation for the interaction of information at the point designated as the location of quantum change. It should be noted that the location of the spirals between 90 and 0 degrees in this example (another way of looking at these would have spirals alternating between the two extremes shown (the first at 90, the second at zero, the third at 45, the subsequent spirals might divide the top of this, the bottom of this or both the tops and bottom triables so formed. At the same time the only length that makes sense at either of these points is quantum length (planck length) which suggests that at the point of change, there is a disruption of information as ct1^2 approaches ct1 and how this disruption can occur in a quantum instance is answered, sadly, in that it cannot.
The solution to these details is critical, but I am not yet at the point where I can put together all the different options and start weeding them out. As previously mentioned, it took 10 years for relativity to be worked out. While I think this can be done much quicker, I have a limited amount of time to invest in something where I'm basically working for glory that isn't glory at all.
However, this reduction to quantum length can help explain how the reversal of "spin" between an oppositely moving spiral. These solutions are necessary additions to the spiral equations which define each of these spirals and the compression equations which describe the intermediary higher spirals.
This is important because AUT holds that the universe is an algorithm imprinted on something called g-space which should provide such a high degree of predictability as to far bypass anything that can be calculated using physics which is but a mirror of the algorithms.
At quantum instants physics of intersections, there are entropy changes, indeed the dark energy aspects of the opposite moving spirals suggests that gravity reverses if you accept linearity and anti-linearity suggested by the intersecting spiral model.
As can be seen by the drawings, spirals off of spirals can include exponentially more instants fitting within the location of intersection by different spirals.
Here is an NLC horror story. nothing we can do affects the spirals.
According to the model, maybe we are on a long drop to the next collision, maybe the short distance after collision before there is a turn which would be a change in physics.
There should be a simple mathematical model that builds linearity (F-series is suggested), the same model should be adaptable without significance alteration to create spirals coming off spirals coming off still other spirals at quantum points, and there should be features using same math creating stacks of exponentially larger compression states.
Speed is one set of points disassociating from other points. What does that say about people who move away from one another? Are they accelerating? Perhaps we need to have quantum points in order to get perspective, quantum points that are shared in the relationships. Perhaps it is a question that will not be answered until I find god in these equations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tadSRbyPrqQ
No comments:
Post a Comment