NLC-Gravity waves and bodies in pools of blood

While many of you are probably thinking that there is no progress towards the second edition of a spiral in amber, that is not correct at all.  It is actually moving forward with some dispatch despite the fact that I probably spend half my time working, working, after all I have to eat; half the remaining time thinking about other things, poetry and good writing, politics, the minutia of life.
But what it all boils down to is that as long as a few pages a day get edited the rewrite gets better.
Perhaps the biggest solution that came from this analysis is the realization that an everything happens at once without time universe requires that we're not an information based universe. Instead we're a formula universe where the formula includes information theory.
As you will recall from an earlier post, the entire universe must, according to a careful reading of einstein and hologram theory (separately, not together) requires that the universe be generated, past, present and future instantaneously, not in a big bang, that primitive, vapid idea arrived at by only examining the evidence and not what lies underneath the evidence (he died from a sudden spontaneous outflow of blood without noting the knife underneath him).
If we are a reflection of a hologram, or if without time everything happens at once, we must have a formula which generates the universe all at one time.  G-space is the environment that can hold such a formula (a cosmic chalkboard of some sort) so that we can continue to exist and be separated forever at moments like these, the ultimate in difficult things to accept.
Hence (see the link to the article below) we see things like this-this is a guy I should talk to just so he doesn't keep saying such rediculous things he'll be embarrassed about one day:
"Astronomers now know that pairs of black holes do exist in the universe, and they are rushing to explain how they got so big. According to Vicky Kalogera of Northwestern University, there are two contenders right now: Earlier in the universe, stars lacking elements heavier than helium could have grown to galumphing sizes and then collapsed straight into black holes without the fireworks of a supernova explosion, the method by which other stars say goodbye. Or it could be that in the dense gatherings of stars known as globular clusters, black holes sink to the center and merge."

The most valuable thing that I take from this is the word galumphing which I thought maybe he'd made up, but turns out not.  Again, he's (1) accepting there is a single big bang, (2) ignoring what caused the big bang-the bigger issue with everyone except me for the moment, (3) trying to use physics to solve a problem when physics is merely the reflection of the solution to a relatively simple algorithm.
The last part of this should have Vicky, interesting name, jumping up and down saying what an idiot to think the universe could be created by a simple algorithm.  That's partially right, the solution is a complex one, but the algorithm should be simple since the "blackboard" that we're written on has no reason to allow a more complicated algorithm.  Further, a more complicated algorithm would probably result in a universe which is too complicated to allow for something like us.  Finally, while the F-series envisioned as underlying the algorithm is used because it allows for a simple construction from nothing to a bunch, curvature has to be explained in some other way (see 108 of the book if you want to see the rough version describing how when these lines reach some critical mass they are curved back towards one another by a gravity solution which is a reflection of intersecting spirals which are oppositely disposed-solved one being the negative of the other)
Oh yes, the article: 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/12/science/ligo-gravitational-waves-black-holes-einstein.html?_r=0

Here's another paragraph to parse: "Conveyed by these gravitational waves, an energy 50 times greater than that of all the stars in the universe put together vibrated a pair of L-shaped antennas in Washington State and Louisiana known as LIGO on Sept. 14"

This "bending of space" is described as "a storm “in which the flow of time speeded, then slowed, then speeded...A storm with space bending this way, then that.”

The idea behind this is the same as the idea that led to NLC being right and everyone else being, well wrong is not exactly right, the solution is being given in terms of what is observed, this guy is not looking for the knife under the body; the blood flow (gravity here) is taken as spontaneous. 

Einstein was not quite sure about these waves, neither am I.  If you accept the definition that they "would compress space in one direction and stretch it in another as they traveled outward," then that is not so inconsistent with stacked spiral theory (which allows for the stuff of space to be compressed and uncompressed as we observe it at the ct4-ct5 and ct3-ct4 intersections, black hole formation and the fission/fusion pairing).

Finally, this occurred according to the time based model of the article "1.2 billion years ago in a distant galaxy, a pair of black holes circled each other. The larger black hole was 36 times the mass of our sun, and the smaller one 29 times.
Three solar masses worth of energy were vaporized in a storm of gravitational waves, distorting space and time and leaving a new black hole 62 times the mass of the sun"  The "vaporization" which led to the "waves" is, in NLC, a solution to an equation that has spirals coming off either from the black hole material itself or the matter released from orbit as the two black holes combine" which isn't a gravity wave at all, but an algorithm solving itself in terms of massive spiral migration from one solution to another and in a fashion where the change is consistent.

Interestingly, the net result of either solution is the same, the question merely remains, who is looking at the knife and who is only looking at the body.