Building from nothing is critical in any serious study of quantum mechanics. While you can do a tremendous amount with QM without looking at origin issues, in the end you're dealing only with effects. The strength of NLC is that it doesn't try to start from space time and work from there. Then you're stuck with this absolutely idiotic idea that the universe started with a big bang. There's just no reason for the universe to originate with a big bang. Something has to cause an explosion like that and pre NLC you might as well be talking about God and while god can well be a player in any of these theories, then you have to explain God. The truth is that if we find there is a god, we're still stuck with the same problem, but instead of trying to crack the secrets of the universe we're stuck tring to overthrow god.
But NLC doesn't start with a big bang. It starts with an F-series that builds rather instantly but without violence. The violence that we see doesn't come from a big bang and certainly doesn't suddenly originate everything which is a fairly stupid idea. It's like saying there is a leak in some other space, not quite as dumb, and actually gets pretty close to NLC which indicates not only an intersecting spiral answer to this, but explains a post collision expansion in terms of a driving algorithm that generates the forces that we call dark energy in pre-nlc science just because all the old theories are stupid and have to come up with things like Higgs bosons and dark energy. It bores me, but I did hear a Higgs Boson joke:
A Higgs Boson (HB) walks into a church.
Catholic Priest: We don't let your kind in our church.
HB: You have to let me in for the service.
CP:Why?
HB: Without me you have no Mass.
All joking aside, the HB is nonsense and the fact that I've figured that out means that I should be given not a new nobel prize, but the old one given for the idea of this thing called the HB. It's sooo stupid, it is just frustrating.
But we're not talking about how stupid everyting pre NLC is, we're talking about building something from nothing. We're really not dealing with nothing, we're dealing with a non-informational universe and a matrix which is, in its own way, more rich than space time.
So how does the F-series we use to generate compression generate enough information from a single bit of g-space?
Using the F-series model each unit grows 1 and keeps whatever was before which also grows one.
But NLC doesn't start with a big bang. It starts with an F-series that builds rather instantly but without violence. The violence that we see doesn't come from a big bang and certainly doesn't suddenly originate everything which is a fairly stupid idea. It's like saying there is a leak in some other space, not quite as dumb, and actually gets pretty close to NLC which indicates not only an intersecting spiral answer to this, but explains a post collision expansion in terms of a driving algorithm that generates the forces that we call dark energy in pre-nlc science just because all the old theories are stupid and have to come up with things like Higgs bosons and dark energy. It bores me, but I did hear a Higgs Boson joke:
A Higgs Boson (HB) walks into a church.
Catholic Priest: We don't let your kind in our church.
HB: You have to let me in for the service.
CP:Why?
HB: Without me you have no Mass.
All joking aside, the HB is nonsense and the fact that I've figured that out means that I should be given not a new nobel prize, but the old one given for the idea of this thing called the HB. It's sooo stupid, it is just frustrating.
But we're not talking about how stupid everyting pre NLC is, we're talking about building something from nothing. We're really not dealing with nothing, we're dealing with a non-informational universe and a matrix which is, in its own way, more rich than space time.
So how does the F-series we use to generate compression generate enough information from a single bit of g-space?
Using the F-series model each unit grows 1 and keeps whatever was before which also grows one.
Graphically, this builds like the intersecting spirals but
these spirals are next to each other, each new one being shorter than the one
giving rising to it (mathematically, there is no real length, these are just algorithm which "instantly according to fixed math models) and each part and each sub part of one giving rise to another. This is shown below, keeping in mind this is the same F-series building that will ultimately lead to intersecting spirals, which is a different part of the equation, but the same basic model.
The first column becomes the first quantum moment once all
of the time states have come into existence.
The second (and subsequent) columns become counters in this model for the subsequent
time states to allow tracking of the quantum state of each point, it can, for
example determine which line will pick up a spiral based on the higher number
being the first spirals to overlap which would provide for a great deal of (1)
space with smaller amounts of higher compression states (4 or 5 in this very
limited example which is only the merest beginning of the 10^100+ quantum
points).
0
1
s
1
2 1
1
s
1
2 1
1
3 2 1
1
2 1
1
s
1
4 3 2 1
1
3 2 1
1
2 1
1
1 1
s
4 1
1
3 2 1
1
2 1
1
2 1
1
1 1
1
s
Now this conceptual model is merely a way for generating enough information to allow for a universe of the type observed with 10^100+ quantum points at each quantum moment (bits, points, whathaveyou) but it does not exist along because at some point this information must generate sufficient space to bring on a model of intersection and the better way to explain this is to have, at the same time, a negative data set
0
-1
s
-1
-1
s
-1 -2
-1
-1-2
-1
s
etc
This is an important step that provides a mechanism for generating information from an algorithm.
But is there more for you?
You'll just have to wait and see, apparently.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEd6QUbK2Mw
Now this conceptual model is merely a way for generating enough information to allow for a universe of the type observed with 10^100+ quantum points at each quantum moment (bits, points, whathaveyou) but it does not exist along because at some point this information must generate sufficient space to bring on a model of intersection and the better way to explain this is to have, at the same time, a negative data set
0
-1
s
-1
-1
s
-1 -2
-1
-1-2
-1
s
etc
This is an important step that provides a mechanism for generating information from an algorithm.
But is there more for you?
You'll just have to wait and see, apparently.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEd6QUbK2Mw
No comments:
Post a Comment