Pages

Saturday, April 14, 2018

Ratios of pi

I'm developing, as part of the rewrite of book 3, the video series which will boil down AuT into 10 minute segments.  Stay tuned.
As I do, however, certain things become more important to understand.
The first video is "space and mass are the same thing."
That is not as catchy as it should be, but that fundamental idea dates back perhaps in one form or another all the way to the Einstein Hologram Universe and is fundamental in nature and when you think about it, even a little bit, is so painfully obvious that it is part of pre-AuT physics.  "Space is the potential to be something else." If you cannot find that quote anywhere, it should be there.
However, fundamental aspects of space are lost if it isn't looked at correctly, if (incorrectly) its given 3 dimensions, it exists as part of "space time" and all the other trappings of pre-AuT physics which is hopelessly muddled in its own self importance.
AuT requires we take a new look at space, a fresh look.  It requires simultaneously that we do the same thing (rethinking) with dimension which leads us to that most edible of math functions, pi.
Normally this is where I would rant a little hate speech, but I'm in a fair mood, seeing the potential of things, so I may or may not go that way.  Also, I am a little worn out, why waste energy on ranting.
AuT starts with the idea that pi is not so much a thing by itself, but the embodiment of the history of things that are something (pi) that is not.

So let's talk about what pi is.
Pi is a ratio.  It's the ratio of the number of places to the transition structure, but its not only that.
The numerator can be positive and negative.
It is worth noting that pi-1=pi(1)*-1 because the numerator is the only thing that changes from one version of pi to the next.  To get to the transitions you have to look at sin functions or change the numerator in terms of scale.
-1 in pi means negative places.  Can you have "not places?"  I think the suggestion of the math is that you can have at least -1, no places, which should be distinguished from 0 places which appears less probable.  Can you have 2xnot places (-2) for numerator?  That appears unlikely although it would provide a basis for anti-matter, a type of "negative curvature."
The current AuT thinking (which is essentially my thinking, as ridiculous as that is) is that anti-matter is not tied to anti-place but is, instead, a function of net charge within a system of curvature states, so that the level of unbalance in a compression state as either negative or positive establishes the compression state as matter or anti-matter.  This is problematic in the study of matter and anti-matter, but that is not an area where I have spent any appreciable time yet and since I'm the only one on earth who has any frigging idea of the true nature of reality, its probably eventually going to be up to me to figure this out.  But that comes later in Book 3.

Why a -1 numerator?  There is only one reason, that is because it gives a ratio I like (256:27) and that mainly because the 256 corresponds to 2f(2)^2^2 and this in turn is 4^4 which corresponds to the basic information concept embodied in the information storage components of computers, not by coincidence but because information is a function of bits which have two possible answers.
But this is also the result of a ratio, the ratio between -1 pi and 1 pi applied to the curvature function and then solved for a 1/-1 solution for sin for 1 place pi.  It's in the books and it is both strange and not.  Pi will be its own course in due course of course.

This ratio is 2^8/3^3 and is fraught with suggestions.  Black holes are a good place to start, black holes are 2f(5)^2^5=16^32 which is also (2^4)^2^5 (coincidence or suggestion?).  A better look is that this foundation ratio is 2^x which is the foundation of information theory and remains a part of the subsequent structure of the universe even as the higher states come into play.
This ratio represents the ct1 line converting to the ct2 line.

The subsequent ratios of compression are 1:x.
The suggestion that there are 27 space ct states to 256 photons is worth considering and largely ignored because one view is based on the changing structure of curvature (27:256=sinspecial(p-1):sinspecial(pi1) while the other is a function of observed compression 1:2f(x)^2^x.  However, the 27:256 is not ct1 to ct2 (that is 1:256 after a fashion) it is instead -1 (ct0) to ct1 (space) in terms of the sin function.
At some point in the process the ratio of the sins of the two pre-dimensional pis make up the compression state matrix number for photons.

When we think about this, we have to remember that the predimensional line of space (ct1) based on the changing values of fpluspix (theorized) is unique among the reflected forces and gravitation in the universe; while the post dimensional line of ct2 (photon) changes directions in space and eventually space-time as the substrate sum of ct1 states change direction.
The remaining forces reflect the compression and decompression of the information arms on which the ct states that have the forces are built.  Gravity is the sum of the underlying ct1 states.

The ratios of -1:fpix to 1:fpix are not gravitational functions but they yield the experience of space and the compression ratio photons.  The 27:256 is mathematical in the sense that 2^2 (the compression ratio for x=1) is the 4k of information theory but not a part of the 27.

But let's look for the 3^3 or more particularly the -3^-3.  Why this?  This is the first sin-1fpix (fpluspix I'm going to start abrieviating as fpix).  Also, -3^-3=1/27 which is the denominator of 256;27 which suggests how the ratio of -1 to 1 of the spin (pi-1,pi1) works out and it is this feature that may give rise to the whole ratio concept that drives compression.

And where do you find the foundation of 27, -3s?  For fpix, it is the first number (other than a possible 1), -3.

All of the ct states, including in some ways, but certainly after ct1, space, can be folded and then pulled apart to yield potential and then actual force in the universe, but space is folded differently because its folding and unfolding yields the forces of gravity and anti-gravity(dark energy) respectively.

Book 2, now updated with all of these tidbits incorporated is now available.
Watch out physics, I'm coming for you.

No comments:

Post a Comment