Higher ct state folds and next weeks speech

I am not going to be able to talk about my exercise this morning, because it is covered in my last post.
I could, I suppose ride my bike to work today, but it is a short day.

This could be a much more interesting blog.
It is six am.
I spent the last hour working on a speech, at least in my mind, about writing across genre that I have to give next week.
Stuff like opening yourself up to the creativity around you and letting it flow through your writing.  Giving the characters a chance to have a voice since they are the most important.
But perhaps the less of the 22 books plus of AuT and their various editions is rewrite, rethink, rewrite again with nothing be sacred.

However it will start with 20 minutes of physics which gives a very technical explanation of where that comes from.  While I am getting ready to lose a few days, I have enough of my new ppt recorded to be that speech and by then I hope to have that up to 20 minutes so I could literally walk in and play my powerpoint.

In a moment I will give a little blurb on my first speaking engagement which is just a practice for Chicago.  But first I have to tell you that I have been invited to be a keynote speaker at the Berlin Physics conference, May 15-16, 2019 at Berlin, Germany.
Now these are small conferences, not like the APS; but in terms of getting credentials it is hard not to take this seriously, as a stepping stone to the APS even though the APS will be first and it is also hard to imagine doing this under the circumstances and without things changing. 

Perhaps I will start a go fund me campaign.

My physics speech will come from this partially finished powerpoint: https://youtu.be/kutFnGwOfPQ

https://youtu.be/kutFnGwOfPQ

Anyway, here is the notice for the practice speech:

"On Saturday, November 17th, hear author Greg Friedlander talk about writing across genres.

"Beginning with a short presentation about quantum physics, Greg will discuss how he writes across various genre. He's the author of romance, occult, SciFi, and historical novels and has several books in progress, including a Christmas story (romantic comedy).

"He also authored treatises on China's weaponized economy and his quantum mechanics theoretical work (developed over the last five years), was published in the Journal of Mathematical Physics and will be presented at the astrophysics and particle physics conference in Chicago."

Back to the blog proper.  The next few days promise added complexity.

vice.com: Black Holes Can’t Account for Missing Dark Matter in the Universe. https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/598w78/black-holes-cant-account-for-missing-dark-matter-in-the-universe?utm_source=mbtwitter

Todays physics blog comes from what is currently Slide 9 in the 20 minute presentation (which is outside of the 20 minutes) and is about ct6 folding.  We know about ct5 black holes trapping galaxies of ct4 within them, but AuT almost assures us that we are in at least the beginnings of a ct6 folding pattern. If we are trapped within the folds of ct6, why not ct7 or 1 million?

The short answer is that there is no reason why not.  When you think that our entire universe has been folded very small 13 billion years ago, it is easy to imagine how difficult it would be to see outside of the 13 billion year expansion, particularly if it is so fast that light, in the ct4 t1-12 form it carries just enough information to see, does not reach the edges, then we are stuck with ct2 forms which hold some secrets in their density, but are hardly to carriers of pictures that folded ct3 has.

Our compressing universe with its multitude of ct5 states and its central core of ct5 states is almost certainly the result and perhaps is required by its compression to be a result of initial ct6 folding 26^64 scale folds of 16^32 black hole folds (1:3.6x10^90 black holes folded into each ct6 and 5.29x10^153 bits of information in a complete ct7 plus at least 75% as many hinge ct1 states plus trapped lower ct states which while statistically much lower, from our ct5 point of reference would be of a universal scale) which allows for the enormous overlap from far corners of existence.  Even if only the first few arms are populated,  the amount of folding would be enormous.

Imagine for a moment that we are folded within a ct6 state which is unfolding, but which itself is folded within a ct7, 42^128 folds or 26^64 or 16^32 and so on.  Ignoring everything below the level of neutrons, if there was a single ct7 (7 out of infinity, mind you) the amount of information, in those 128 folds would be of an essentially infinite scale where our point of view was limited to only the first arm or twoof the ct6 compression state.