Shrodinger`s cat part quatre*

Now that post name is clever.
I swam 2300 yards including 1000 im which was something of an undertaking, today being typically busy for the day before thanksgiving.
Happy thanksgiving, btw.
I am not allowed to give vent to my thoughts today, but let me at least be allowed to say I give thanks to that which I do not have and that to which I aspire.

In my last post I solved in broad language the dual slit anomally.
In fact, by the end of the week I hope to submit this as my article to APS which will be something of moment, I hope.

You can already get the gist of it by ordering the 3 books advertised and with the last 3 posts although I will include some bits of it.
I will in conjunction with the submission publish the 4th edition of the summary, update book 1 of the compendium and file the 4th patent, not necessarily in that order.  I hope I may also be allowed to say that the dedications will not change for the same reasons previously given.

Since it is already given, I am publishing the basic track of the specific portions of abstract and discussion related to this newest of articles.

The double slit anomally has plagued pre-AuT physics,  but like the big bang, dark energy and black holes; the explanation comes readily with the application of Algorithm Universe Theory.  This article will discuss the solution to the anomaly, although it will only cover so much of AuT as is necessary to correct advances in the theory since the October 24, 2018 publication of the book review in the Journal of Mathematical Physics.

To that end it will briefly discuss ct3 at the photon state, the first 12 arms of ct4 as wave energy, briefly discuss hinge states, all of which are covered in detail in Volumes 1 and 2 of Algorithm Uniiverse Theory Compendium.

The hinge states are shown generally in the form of f-series expansion, but some mention at least must be made concerning the applicability of exponential (2^n)-1 compression being an element of the information arm curvature and foundation for compression as shown in the drawing below.

(Insert the f-series 2^n vs 2^n-1 drawing)
It can be readily understood from the disclosure that the first information arm loading reflects a strength which is 10 vs 10^16 for the last arm and that the first rule of 3 state of wave compression along ct4 is 10^4.  This corresponds to 10-12th (or with equal arm loading 1 fourth) the energy of the strong force.

This state is also made up of 10^4 ct3 states by definition.  It is also understood these are in flux with free ct3 states as well as the lower ct states surrounding, trapped and as hinge states within the structure which rapid exchange is shown by the perceived velocity associated with compression and decompression of wave states which we view as energy.

The figure above shows at the bottom this arrangement in concept with the wave and photon states in a loose matrix.  The actual size of the matrix and the surrounding lower ct states and the hinge structures are not shown and are not completely necessary for a full understanding of this solution of the anomaly.

The eye represents the sensor which is monitoring the passage of photons.  For purposes of this discussion, it is presumed that the sensor is sensing wave structures and that the photon stream is a t4 ct3-4 transition state.  It remains possible that the photon stream is a lesser stream (e.g. a t1 transition state which would be more unstable, but that is merely a question of degree and does not change the overall solution.
For this purpose it is also going to be assumed that the T4 state (which could be a t1 state) breaks down into ct3 states when the ratio of free ct3 states to t4 compressed ct3 states drops below act3:bt4:cht4 ct3 states where a,b and c are variables, ht4 are the t4 hinge states, act3 represents the free ct3 states and bt4 represents the t4 ct3-4 transition states.
As long as the states are in balance this represents a wave which has a heavy component of photons or states which appears under pre-aut physics as photon similar waves due to the high ration of ct3 states to t4 states.  This is what pre-AuT physics refers to as a "stream of photons" in double slit tests and it maintains its wavelike features when projected through twin slits creating a dispersion interference pattern associated with waves.
When a sensor is put to this state, however, the numbers b or c begin to decrease and the overall structure destabilizes and drops down where the act3 states dominate nowithstanding the exponential nature of compression of the higher states.
This appears more like a pure stream of ct3 states and gives the particulate structure thereby explaining without any pseudo-science the anomaly.
It remains possible that the formula would look like this atu:bty:ctz where the tu structure is more particulate, but still a transitional compression state and the tz is more wavelike and where the same break down in response to absorption by the sensor of tz states (or ty states in this example) occurs.
While it can be argued that the sensor does not absorb enough tz/ty to destabilize the structure, the results of the test rebut this argument.
There is one alternative where the sensor’s interaction stabilizes the matrix to a photon-like T state but that is a very similar result, although less likely.

A note on stupidity.  I believe this explains me, perhaps as best I can for the moment, but I feel on the verge of a change.  It may be that this was previously here, but it made its way into the next edition of the summary and for purposes that need not be covered in detail here it is not appropriate to that and so I include it below as a place to park it.

If you look at the news and ask yourself, how can everyone be so stupid, and if you then tell yourself, I have plenty of money and I would like to invest some of it in how to stop stupid, then I have an investment for you; because I understand what stupid is. At the same time, I am looking for a few investors who are willing to invest in the future. Over the last 5 years I developed Algorithm Universe theory and in 2018 the certainty behind the theory and the development reached the point where patents could be filed. There is a new physics which might yield results fast or it might be slow, but the technology is the future of applied quantum mechanics. Do you want to invest in real floating cars?  Faster than light travel?  Space elevators?  Unlimited energy? All of these things are part of the promise of a new physics. Whether they can achieved or not remains to be seen, but if you want to invest in the future, there is no better investment. A new vision of physics might hold the key to these things. In 2013 an investigation into the shortcomings of the standard model, hologram theory and relativity led in just 5 years to a new model of the universe. One which explains the balance of features that give rise to dimension, force and time.