non linear time theory-time compression Chapter 1

One of the problems with trying to understand non-linear time theory from a newtonian point of view (or even a string or relativistic point of view) comes from the fact that we want to look at time as concentrated which we observe but which is not the case.
Despite several entries covering this, the remains a great deal of unnecessary confusion on this point.  Mathematically, the confusion can be addressed even if it isn't addressed in any other way.  in order to do this, several assumptions will be made.  The first is that there are 3 clock times (as discussed previously, one gives rise to matter, one to energy and one to space as the time is "concentrated").  It will be further assumed for purposes of allowing this to be understood (not because it is rational) that each of the clock times has 3 coordinates (the use of 6 coordinates would also be possible, but is unnecessary to explain this feature of Non-linear time.
Therefore, for these two points you get something like this using newtonial concepts:
P1=D(CT1(x,y,z)+CT2(x,y,z)+CT3(x,y,z))dt.  P2 would be described the same way.
However a "better" equation might be P1=D(x(ct1,ct2,ct3), y(ct1,ct2,ct3),z(ct1,ct2,ct3))dt because what's really happening is that all you have is clock time and the dimensional aspects are the consequence of the changing of clock times which is non-newtonial, non-relativistic, non-string; but still Einsteinian, somehow.
In order to understand this equation, you will see that D is an equation which is based on the "change" in time, such as integrating the point from an initial clock time to a final clock time.
Several features of this equation serve to define it.
First, there is a conservation of change.  Clock time changes are conserved with changes in dimensional coordinates.  If you change your x,y, z coordinates fast enough, for example, clock time 3 goes to zero.  It also appears that clock times are conserved relative to one another which leads to the assumption that:
Second, Clock times interchange with one another along a factor a the speed of light squared, at least between clock time 2 and clock time 3.  This means that when you go from energy to matter, you require a tremendous (by our newtonian standards) amount of clock time 2.  For similar reasons, "space" seems empty because of the huge amounts of clock time 1 which are necessary in order to form clock time 2, presumably along the same ration, but a discussion of how much is required is a separate chapter in and of itself.
Third, the "visibility" in newtonian space or relativistic space of clock time is defined by change.  If the coordinates are not changing, we don't see it.
Fourth, in the absence of clock time 1 and 2, it is likely that "instantaneous" movement around the universe is possible.  This is observed at two, possibly related points.  First, in black holes where clock times 2 and 3 g to zero with the results that (a) before they hit zero they are ejected as high speed energy, (b) theoretically in the expansion of space outside of gravity wells we see the instantaneous movement of space to expand space.
Fifth, with clock time 2 and 3, coordinate change is linear, there is not instantaneous movement, which leads to the corrollary that dimensional coordinates are not changing with clock time 1 but are instead "fixed" which reduces the visibility as noted above.  For purposes of instantaneous travel about the universe, this means that you have to eliminate clock time 2 and 3 in order to have this type of movement, but once you do you can move about the grid with relative ease...as long as you aren't planning on coming up near any gravitational field.
Sixth, since gravity is the tendency of time to go non-linear, it stands to reason that watch time is the tendency of clock time 3 to go to zero and that is is, therefore, equivalent to gravity or, if you would, that gravity is equivalent to clock time 3.  This, of course, is inherent in the formulation of gravity which is, after all, an acceleration which is coordinate change.
Seventh, All three clock times are part of a single clock time just as all dimensional coordinates are part of a single aspect of all three clock times.  Other aspects of the equation will be covered as we continue on with this discussion.
For the compression of clock time 1 to yield clock time 2 (and therefore energy) and the compression of clock time 2 to yield clock time 3 (and therefore matter) two things occur.  In the first case (ct1 to ct2) you have to establish "linear" coordinate change (x,y,z must change "together" and in "proximity" to one another or you cannot get "concentration".  You don't have this when clock time 2 and clock time 3 are zero.  Clock time 1 apparently allows for a near random movement to locations where there is "no pre-existing clock time 2).  This suggests, that gravity is a function of clock time 2, although there must be some interchangeable quality defining the linearity of clock time 1 which yields some gravitational component.
This feature can be described as CT1-non linear time along one "time line" yields "component x", CT-2 yields gravity (as a time feature), CT-3 yields watch time.  It is noteworthy, that CT1, 2 and 3 exist in all phases of clock time (otherwise energy would be invisible and space would drop out of the universe), the key element being that they cease to change at certain dispersal (as opposed to concentrations where they appear).
The Zeno/Perminides theoretical, says this is based on the illusory nature of the universe.  It is less about illusion, however, and more about the nature of time.  We are not an illusion, so much as we are a manifestation of time going non-linear which is the Einstein prediction.
Now that we have a framework, we can move on to how these time coordinates get progressively closer together and why this allows for the different clock times to go from zero change to a positive change, but that is the subject of the next chapter.