non linear time theory-time compression Chapter 6 Both sides of the looking glass-space peas and Universal expansion finding

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/17/cosmic-inflation-theory-early-universe-expansion_n_4979486.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Chtmlws-main-bb%7Cdl10%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D454769

There are a couple of ways to approach the universe.  Every other way and Non-Linear Time theory.  Now that isn't really fair to the variety of other theories, but many of them fall under NLT (or some derivative thereof like Einstein Hologram Theory and perhaps Biblical creation which I posit is more likely under NLT than the big bang or its progeny, not that there isn't a big bang in NLT, it's just a different big bang).

I will now, in advance of a bunch of other things, layout a framework for this.
First, we'll start with pre-NLT and Post PUG Theory (described below in more detail).  This is the "mistaken" theory of the universe dating from roughly 2500 years ago to say three years ago.
 NLT occupied by the "cabal" and such worthies as Einstein who laid the groundwork for NLT (Einstein and to a lesser extent the cabal).  We'll call this Cabal Einstein theory (CET)
In this theory there is something for the big bang to expand into.  Now not all versions of this allow for space outside the observed universe, but they don't explain what's out there (nothing under NLT theory since there is no "out there") or if they do explain it, the do it with a lot of mumbo jumbo that describes a certain something other than our space out there.  One of my favorites, before NLT was another type of space which was "eaten up" by our space moving into it just as we might be eaten up by some other type of space.  Makes for a good science fiction story, but pretty unsatisfying considering what actually was found out.  It's like believing your whole life that moon is made up of precious resources and a launchpad to the rest of the solar system only to discover one day that it's only cheese.  And of course, you don't need a launch pad under NLT to get anywhere else in the universe, but that's an earlier chapter.
Further, under the more developed theories, "space" bends.  This brilliant interpretation of the data almost seems like an intentional red herring.  You have to think, in light of some of the other writings that Einstein was just trying to see if he could fool everyone else...but why?
And, of course, under CET you have to ask questions like why does space bend, how come you don't have unified fields, why does matter and energy interchange, etc and most people just accept that blindly.  Also, these theories don't explain why a type of god is possible (not that one exists, but at least you want a basis for one in your physics if you're not going purely on faith which is ok too if you're into that kind of analysis), how to deal with the clear evidence that the universe is an "illusion" (given infinite series and the like) that PUG Theory dictates (see below) and a lot of other stuff that CETs apparently don't give a "rat's ass" about (to use the greek term).
Under NLT, there is not any real space.  Now I know, the purist among my readers are saying that this is just Perminides Universe Greek Universe Theory )PUG Theory (I had to rearrange the letters to give it a cute acronym); but they didn't have relativity, astronomy or String Hologram Theory to work with so their pitch was a little low (or at least what survives of it) even though its basically correct.  If someone wants to argue my Nobel Prize should go to some dead Greek guys, I'd just point out that I don't have a Nobel Prize to give.  The fact that I'd never heard of any of the pre-socratic philosophers is only because the education system in this country is down the tubes and apparently has been for years, but that's another blog.  Fortunately, my critics are smarter than I am.
Anyway, not any real space...Instead space is just a manifestation of time (theorized), just as energy is a manifestation of space (theorized) and matter a manifestation of energy (proven, sort of-at least we can blow up other time manifestations with the theory).  So what's the difference?  Well, in Einstein and earlier theories (going back to Zeno/Perminides where they get closer back to NLT) "space time" is presumed to exist.  While there is massive speculation of what "space is" and while Einsteinian and even Z/P misconstrued it (leaving the door wide open for NLT to fill this void) you still had "space-time" of some sort, something real after Z/P, something more like NLT before, but not specified.
NLT fills the void, by telling exactly what space is. Space is just time going non-linear or at least appearing to go non-linear.  More on this in the next chapter.