http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/17/cosmic-inflation-theory-early-universe-expansion_n_4979486.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Chtmlws-main-bb%7Cdl10%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D454769
Let's continue with our discussion of the "couple of ways" to approach the universe, "every other way and Non-Linear Time theory."
We have outlined PUG Theory (Perminides Universe Greek) and CET (Cabal Einstein) and the "GARA" theory most of you might subscribe to.
Let us go a little further: Under NLT, there is not any real space. This means that "space" can be quantized, but not in terms of existence. Instead it is quantum non-linearity coordinates. What we perceived in ancient times (pre-CET) as a medium is not anything and is everything as it were. That is, it is the same time that creates everything out expressing itself as coordinates, P1, P2, etc. What we perceive as a "separation" of the quantum fluctuations is nothing more than the changes of quantum times expressed with some linearity. The "why" is important. Why do some NLTs stay in proximity while others appear (space expansion) far apart? These are the real physics questions that survive NLT, although to some extent they are inherent in the theory. We know, for example, that linearity in different time dimensions and concentrations expresses itself in the tendencies to go non-linear that we perceive as EMT, Gravity and Clock Time. And this gets us at last to time concentration, but before we go too far into that, let's finish this further analysis.
Space is just a manifestation of time (theorized), just as energy is a manifestation of space (theorized) and matter a manifestation of energy. If space is just a manifestation why should it have any rules. If we want to change them (and we do change them if we can-this is a pre-destination question, we certainly "think" we change them as we use "free will") we need to know why they act the way they do. Why are their movements so linear. The supposition is that because they are quantized in nature (one time sequentially changing) it makes sense that it would change in the same fashion except in some situations it appears that it doesn't.
We can look at time changes then as being of two possible types. One type, most commonly observed being those we observe in everyday "gravitationally affected space" (GAS) that is space that involves more than one changing time coordinate P(x,dy,dz) or P(dx,dy,dz) or P(dx,y,dz).
This compares to what we call "empty space" P(x,y,dz); P(dx,y,z); or P(x,dy,z) if you would. Empty space may have the ability to have non-relative quantum changes. The second derivative of time manifests itself as gravity or EMF and there is a good argument for either (the prior being a manifestation of the first derivative of time in the creation of space). But whatever the manifestation, it has the effect (under this conceptual framework) of encouraging nearby times to change at the same rate which allows for combination. So are we going to talk about combination at last?
Well, maybe not right away.
If NLT says space is just time going non-linear, and by that we can add it is at least appearing to go non-linear and if we "perceive" this as a three dimensional framework and if there are facets of time (we can't really call them forces because they are not the forces of our universe) which encourage combination, then the forces of our universe are likely reflections or manifestations of those. So Combination now?
No, not yet. Space, energy and matter are not things, they are only manifestations of change.
Hence to think of combination, you have to think of changing in the same way and at the same rate. It sounds like we're ready for combination, but there's more to reconcile first.
Remember, Einstein seemed on the verge of grasping the true nature of things (time), but he was stuck with the idea that "everyone had their own time" which would be similar to saying "every fundamental particle has its own time" which is only true in a universe with space time and discrete "matter" which, sadly, we are not. He also failed to recognize that it was only change in time that was perceptible or even important to us. He instead accepted that space-time and its contents were "created" which is contrary to intuitive thinking. In short, no one stood behind him saying "All glory is fleeting and Parminides figured out that reality was an illusion 2500 years ago." I on the other hand, have just such a person behind me. "Quiet, let me think."
We now know several things that Einstein didn't know. One is that there is conservation of time just as there is conservation of mass and energy, at lease in a closed gravitational system. Another is that what we "perceive" (and what can kill us) is on the change in time coordinates of a non-linear time. (one perhaps or more). We do not "each have our own time" but instead we all have one time with many dimensional facets of change and these facets are conserved.
Ready for compression? We'll have to wait for the next chapter.
No comments:
Post a Comment