While I strive for consistency, as with any rough and developmental work, there are going to be bumps, realignment, wrong assumptions, dead end paths, changing time frames (how ironic) and the like. Those always get more glaring as we arrive closer to the ends of analysis, closer to what we know and in this case we "know" large particle science (protons, electrons, etc). I've given up looking for positive feedback and understanding, and instead will just present what we have, continue on as I have no real alternative to continue on (or drop the whole damn thing which might be a good suggestion, but as impossible for me as the next good suggestion) and you will, if you stay with me, see bizarre and unexpected confluences of results. Time is an enemy, it is given to us in limited amounts and its history fixes our actions in ways we do not like especially if we're unwilling to change, like putting this forth in pieces instead of all at once. As we examine it in retrospect, it inserts often unwanted and unexpected changes, like replacing the European discovery of America by Spain with European vikings 400 years before (if you can call discovering Canada discovering America (just a joke there) and, of course, keeping in mind that the hemisphere was well colonized and discovered before any of these arrivals by European/Asians from the Western side of Canada thousands of yeas earlier. If you don't like it, you can wait for the finished version. If it hurts to much mentally to follow, so much the better for you if you stop. "Any great grief, the the grief itself man have gone, leaves in its place a train of horrors, of misery and despair." F. Maddox Ford, The good Soldier.
We are going to start looking at large particles
(i.e. CT4 states) in NLT, high concentration spin states, concentrations of multiple time states within
a confined set of coordinates and
trapped time states which are resulting structures from time orbits.
Angular momentum is a function of gravity and is, in theory, present in all forms of nlt (perceived space, energy and matter).
Rotation around an axis is only seen in CT4 concentrations and states. However, the size of the axis can vary and the explanation has to cover different forms of matter, and NLT allows for that.
As is known, there is conservation of dimensional coordinate change in NLT and this conservation extends over the various forms of clock time.
An electron has massive coordinate change about the axis while the proton has relatively slow coordinate change. As expected, in this exchange you see higher concentrations of clock time coordinated change with the proton. And the factor of concentration, both surprisingly and non surprisingly is.
e=9x10^-31 kg//5.6x10^-15m (this length is based on the size necessary to carry charge and not based on observation)
p=1.7x10^-27kg (and the same, of course) to this scale/decimal point for a neutron)/2x10-14m (Note that there is some disagreement and 10^-15 is as likely; non linear time theory allows that diameter is a fiction and fluctuates depending on the rate of change of coordinates, traditional physicists are baffled by the change in diameter on these scales)
or roughly a 10^5 difference; i.e. there is no clock time shifting but there is a transition in charge as well as the rate of coordinate change.
The idea here is that all planck length particles have the ability to rotate about an axis (spin); but the minimum size for any subatomic particle is: 1.6x10^-35 meters (not to be confused with grams used above).
When you look at the theoretical mass of a plank length sub-atomic particle you begin to wonder if you're seeing staged coordinate change and this naturally leads to the question of why changes occur.
First remember that CT1-CT3 have not gone away, only gone negative. Also they are going negative at different scales CT1 having started first is far more negative than CT3 which is a quantum latecomer to negative change. It is further important to note that while we're using numbers to model this, numbers are creatures of linear space and NLT abhors linear space.
We have 3 charge states (at least) that we can look at:
1) negative-least concentration of CT4, CT3 not as negative as a result; rate change in dimensions highest
2) positive-higher concentration of CT4, CT3 more negative; rate change relatively low
3) Neutral-combined electron and protron
Complicating the analysis is that like with all other rate changes, the rate change of these sub-atomic particles, but still particles, is affected by vibrational rate changes which can be called heat (or warmth for those of us who care) KE = 1/2 m v^2.
The idea that you should be building is that if you were above to concentrate electrons on the scale of 10^5 and slow the rate change; you could, in theory change the charge and structure of electrons to that of protons. For those of you who just coughed your coffee through your noses; I'm not saying you can do this, there is an issue of conservation of charge to be dealt with. You can, of course, in NLT change electrons to anything else.
For the moment what we are looking at is an exchange of energy (here we're going to accept that energy (ke in this case) is negative CT1-CT3 which is being exchanged for changes in CT4 coordinates.
To be continued...
No comments:
Post a Comment