As we move forward to discuss the expansion of space, many of the scoffers are hacking (scoffing?) their hearts out, but they are providing little in the way of alternatives. Also, while I was not aware that Zeno had plowed this field (without the benefit of relativity) long before String theory started dreaming up holograms, I'd point out that it's really a continuation of the Greek mistakes, rather than mine (Ha! bet you didn't see that coming).
Anyway, today we'll talk more about expansion and why it appears to occur outside of gravity wells when you would expect just the opposite (from the big bang). This "suggests" that spatial expansion at the time of the big bang must have been something very special. It further suggests that some "rate" must have been present in high concentrations of space that is not present today where there are high concentrations of space that have accumulated into matter (where c1 has gone from zero to positive number). This suggests that energy can exist within rate change (where c1 is zero) but matter cannot. Or it suggests the opposite, space can be created in the presence of energy (which it surely is given the fact that energy travels through space being created) but space is not created in the presence of linear clock time!
Those of you who actually follow this (probably no one) have just fallen out of your chairs. Everyone else is probably scoffing up your lunch. However, this explanation will get even more interesting before we stop this entry before moving on to the next one. But first, let's divert for two paragraphs.
First, under NLT theory, there is no space and hence the expansion of the universe into something that makes no sense (some other dimension, some unspace like material, etc) is irrelevant, wrong and in the words of Zeno, an illusion. Likewise, the so-called acceleration of the universe is merely dimensions coordinates changing in favor (or over) conserved clock time. However the increased amount of space (which is linear time) must either be an expansion of space or the creation of additional quantum space and if there is conservation, then some other quantum elements must be exchanged. Of course, this makes traditional questions of dark energy irrelevant and dank matter can be reflected as nothing more than space itself which in this theory is a diluted (by c^2) form of energy and has mass related to its tendency to return to non-linear forms.
As the volume of the universe changes, the amount of change of the space coordinates and the rate of creation of quantum space (if such in fact occurs) can be calculated with a surprising amount of accuracy for an estimation.
Before we continue down this path, let's go back to why space expands and why it doesn't. What are the parameters? First, let's look at what is happening. why doesn't expansion occur (at least not in large observable quantities to offset gravity) occur in the presence of the concentration of matter. While we could just say, gravity pulls everything towards non-linearity, that would be missing the most interesting feature of non-linear time theory. And we will point that out and then end this blog entry:
Something starts (clock time 1) when energy (e) turns into matter. This implies that something (clock time 2) starts when space turns into energy. And this, in turn implies that something (clock time 3) starts when non-linear time goes linear. If this is the case, there should be features of each of these clock times and in fact we can say they do exist in one of two embodiments:
1) Each dimension we experience is merely movement along one of the 3 clock times or
2) The other two clock times function apart (like other dimensions as discussed before) or
3) We experience all 3 clock times but do not realize it, they all appear to be our single clock time.
Now clock times should have the same conservation elements that we experience with dimension, so it is likely that clock times and dimensional changes are the same. It is even possible that a higher state than matter exists where a 4th clock time starts. So let's cover this in terms of creation of the universe and subsequent expansion.
1) Non-linear Time. No clock times are linear, everything happens at once.
2) CT(3) goes linear. We have the predecessor universe where most fundamental physicists begin to speculate on what the universe is. It is one dimensional and everything is concentrated in a single point, but it is linear. Space can now form, but is so concentrated that the space can actually convert to energy.
3) CT(2) goes linear and we have the expansion of of the universe, energy forms from space.
4) CT(1) goes linear and matter forms from concentrations of energy.
Even the shape of our universe can be explained by this process which first provides a two dimensional framework and then a three dimensional framework for expansion as well as providing a basis for unified forces (see prior entries for the explanation), quantum gravity, a basis for quantum versus linear creation, and forces for dark energy and matter based on the tendency of time to become non linear being reflected in gravity.
During each step of the creation of linearity in our universe, gravity is created, but is more concentrated. The tendency to return to non-linearity and in certain concentrations apparently succeeds. Clock time going linear allows dimensional time to become more concentrated. This is expected in terms of conservation of change, conservation of time and dimension.
It is observed that in the presence of ct(1) and possibly ct(2) space cannot be created. Outside the presence of ct1 and ct2, space is created.
In the presence of c1 and ct2 the appearance of matter and energy exist by virtue of the constant change of coordinates. Space both existing and new space exist by virtue of the constant change of coordinates.
Note that while multiple clock times are specified, it is equally likely that each change in linearity is a function of a single clock time with multiple dimensions since time and dimensions appear to be conserved.
But more on this in the next entry.
No comments:
Post a Comment