We have previously discussed the energies which are likely in converting non-linear time to linear time (space) and the conversion of space to energy. We have reason to believe the energies are equivalent.
We see the conversion of space back to non-linear time in black holes and the energies are sufficient to reduce space itself to nothing; but observable energies seem more likely attributable to the predicted conversion of matter and energy to higher energy energy which can escape.
The conversion of energy back to space should be a part of the process and may be reflected (see earlier entries) at least in part in the release of high frequency energies. If there is another type of time (clock time 2), it should be seen to be affected also.
C1 refers to the potential for a speed of light based on a Clock Time (2). Clock time (2) would function just like our clock time but along a different time frame. The reason to speculate on its existence is the same as the reason we "perceive" multiple dimensions.
Remember that in Non-Linear Time theory there are no "true" dimensions, they are just coordinate shifts of quantum time. At most, the quantum coordinate shifts are in one dimension at a time. The interesting feature of these are that they change to create an image of three separate dimensions. Therefore, it is equally likely that there would be matching clock times. For the reason we don't experience these other two clock times, see the prior blog entry on this subject.
Now many will call these "altettrnate dimension" equivalents and that is not the worst analogy ever. The truth is, however, that they are just different coordinant changes, at least according to the theory. To set it out, our "universe" is an accumulation (or sum...or increasing sum-see below) of changing coordinates as time goes non-linear in quantum steps. So E(for sum) I(integration from zero (non-linear time) to infinity (or wherever time changes run out) e(energy)(ct1, ct2, ct3; x, y, z)dt where ct stands for clock time and x,y and z are the three dimensional coordinates and where all of these 6 derive from time so, for example x=t+t1 reflecting that it doesn't exist but for its linearity along one of the dimesions of the quantum time generating the universe.
Now, for those of you who are totally confused, remember that Non-linear time theory assumes that is it possible for a single quantum of non-linear time to create the entire universe. It can do this because it exists without time or dimension and, according to einstein, everything happens at once with this single quantum time anyway. While the EHAO is a foundation of Einstein Hologram Theory (meaning that there is predestination); it is less certain in Non-Linear Time Theory although it suggests that a force of randomness that defies our concept of randomness is at work since the force involves "random" change is a place where linear space and time are created because they are not linear there.
Further, we only "perceive" quantum fluctuations when they fluctuate. That is, we do not perceive (at least not yet) non-linear time except by its absence (black holes).
Getting back to the equation, then, at least one of the six variables must change (ct1-3, x, y or z) for us to perceive it. This is not unexpected since all of our "senses" involve detecting change. As has been mentioned previously if we accept more than one clock time, it is likely we only see ct1 or perhaps ct1-2 (well save this for another blog entry) the other ct3 being unperceptable since we don't experience it along the time line(s) that we exist.
Constatnt creation of linear time by a single quantum non-linear time is not "required" but is actually more likely than the alternative since there is no "room" for other quantum times to exist in non-linear time environments. Since we have constant changes in coordinates in the universe and since we apparently have the constant creation of additional linear time (space) in our perception of the universe, from our perspective this "quantum time" is very busy and if it is truly random (sorry Einstein?) it has tremendous potential for randomness. Either way it has huge potential, but conceptually, it is more 'believable' to give it the godlike quality of pre-ordaining everything so that the unvierse in all of its changing complexity is more like a movie being played than a life being lived (see the prior entry on the power given to the individual by such a pre-ordained universe in prior blogs, for indeed this gives you tremendous power even though it seems like this would be contra-indicated if you are 'scripted').
So where is the "energy" associated with the (1) creation of linear time (space)from non-linear time and (2) in the creation of energy from concentrations of space (the big bang).
Looking to the creation of non-linear time or the creation of energy from c^2 concentrations of space; in such an event the power associated with this conversion may result in energy which is transferred along another time line so that we do not expeience it. This is not a true "separate dimension" but instead is a dimension of our universe (our quantum time) just a line of it that we do not see or experience because it is moving in time parallel (perpendicular) to us. To understand this, imagine an explosion that is going to happen in one second. It doesn't hurt you, right? That is the idea behind clock time (2) it never happens to us, it's always 1 quantum instant away. It is also true that this is likely the "power" that drives the expansion of the universe and is "anti-gravity" on a universal scale so that we actually see this huge energy effecting the quantum changes of the universe in every direction and it is so great that were we to actually experience it along our time (ct1) we'd probably be fried to a crisp every instant of every change. Imagine if we could tap into it..and we can, of course, if it exists since it is part of the overall quantum change.
(2) Looking to the creation of energy from huge concentrations of space; we have the "big bang" for starters, the only time when the concentrations of space were sufficient to create energy...except maybe in black holes where gravitational forces have made time non-linear despite This is "conservation of time, gravity and anti-gravity." If space is constantly being created, it seems likely that it must constantly be "uncreated" and this would be reflected in the number of black holes and the constant creation of black holes. This suggests the illogical (but largely predicted) conclusion that at some point in time, space would stop collapsing (no more black holes) and that consequently the creation of space would stop, potentially with a corresponding stop in the change of time coordinates (i.e. we'd cease to be detectable which may or may not be the same thing as ceasing to exist depending on what is happening in Non-linear space.). Fortunately, this doesn't appear the case since black hole creation (linear time creation) seems to happen much slower than the creation of linear time (changing coordinates for the whole universe plus additional space being created); but with ct(s) that we do not perceive, we cannot be certain what's happening along those other time lines.
More on this later, "time" permitting.
No comments:
Post a Comment